The Mike Rice Video and Coaching Responsibilities

Mar 13, 2013; New York, NY, USA; Rutgers Scarlet Knights head coach Mike Rice cheers on his team against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish during the second half of a Big East tournament game at Madison Square Garden. Notre Dame won 69-61. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

ESPN’s Outside The Lines aired the Mike Rice video on Tuesday, and it’s difficult to watch. The Rutgers basketball coach is shown shoving, kicking and hurling balls at players. Various profanities are bleeped out, but one-time Rutgers assistant Eric Murdock paints a picture vivid enough to get around the censors.

Rice was suspended three games when Rutgers administrators were informed of his conduct. A more severe punishment may have been in order had athletic director Tim Pernetti predicted public scrutiny once this became national news. Everyone from media, to your average Twitterer and even the best player in basketball had an opinion.

Pernetti appeared on FOX Sports Radio in October and discussed bringing national attention to the Rutgers athletic department. He’s certainly getting it now, but of the negative variety.

Sports Illustrated national college football columnist Andy Staples brought up an interesting point: coaches recruiting against Rutgers football coach Kyle Flood have ammunition via Pernetti’s leinient action against player abuse.

It’s not necessarily fair to Flood, a longtime assistant to Greg Schiano with a reportedly strong rapport among his Rutgers players. But then, what is fair on the recruiting trail?

Coaches’ treatment of players goes well beyond the hardwood and football field of Piscataway, N.J. Two notable instances of high profile players alleging mistreatment surfaced this past college football season. Marquess Wilson accused Washington State Cougars head coach Mike Leach and his staff of abuse. Minnesota Golden Gophers wide receiver A.J. Barker left the team late in the 2012 campaign, before posting a scathing letter addressed to Jerry Kill on his Tumblr account.

October 27, 2012; Stanford, CA, USA; Washington State Cougars head coach Mike Leach (right) talks to quarterback Jeff Tuel (10) during the second quarter against the Stanford Cardinal at Stanford Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports


We may never know the validity of either players’ charges. Later actions called some of their complaints in to questions: Wilson back-tracked and Leach was cleared* and Barker was arrested not long after his messy break-up from the Gopher football team. Their accusations might be easily dismissed as the backlash of the disgruntled exception.

Perhaps this was the underlining truth of each of the above cases. Again, we may not know. Likewise, we may never know how many more Mike Rices there are leading basketball or football programs around the nation.

Leach was fired from Texas Tech in 2009 amid charges of player mistreatment, however. He was one of three BCS conference coaches dismissed following that season: the USF Bulls parted ways with Jim Leavitt after Leavitt alleged slapped a player; the Kansas Jayhawks terminated Mark Mangino’s contract for verbal assaults on players.

The Leach-Texas Tech situation may have done more harm in preventing future player abuse than good. Craig James used the pulpit he had via ESPN to level charges against Leach.

Perhaps James’ claims of Leach mishandling the former’s son, Adam, would be treated differently had James not used the spotlight to prosthelytize on politics and launch his ill-fated senatorial campaign.

Again, the accuser comes off as having an ulterior motive. The more such cases like these there are, the more difficult it becomes for true whistleblowers to come forward.

Notice it was a coach, not a player, coming forward with allegations against Rice. It’s difficult for players to do so.

Think of your own life. Maybe you held a job with a manager whose methods were questionable — unethical, even. Coming forward is much easier said than done when you need the paycheck. And simply finding another job isn’t any easier, particularly with the importance of a letter of recommendation.

It’s similar for an athlete. You’re in your late teens/early 20s. Your education is paid, under the condition you fulfill your obligations to the athletic program. Transferring is a possibility, but you’re committed to your university. Further, how much more difficult does transferring become when you’re seen as a malcontent? Or, to put it in more basic but more popular terms, a snitch?

It was played up to an extreme, but such situations bear resemblance to Kevin Spacey’s threats against Jason Bateman in the 2011 comedy Horrible Bosses: “Settle in, because you’re here for the long haul.”

Head coaches become public representatives of their universities. Tim Pernetti is discovering this fact’s significance the hard way. Thus, the university athletic department harbors responsibility to ensure a coach has his players’ best interest in mind.

Because players are rarely going to address concerns publicly, and since Eric Murdocks are rare, one possibility is closer internal monitoring of practices.

*UPDATED on APRIL 3: Reader input suggested the addition of Leach’s exoneration by the Pac-12 Conference, which only further extrapolates on the point that bad grievances impact other cases, like that at Rutgers.

Topics: Football, Minnesota Golden Gophers, Rutgers Scarlet Knights, Texas Tech Red Raiders, Washington State Cougars

Want more from Saturday Blitz?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • Fred Garvin

    Seriously? Leach was cleared by both WSU & the Pac 12 of any and all “abuse”. Wilson’s step dad made the entire story up. “had Leach not used the spotlight to prosthelytize on politics and launch his ill-fated senatorial campaign.” Leach ran for senate? News to me….fact check…it was James who ran for senate, not Leach. Your lack of credibility regarding Leach is glaring.

    • Kyle Kensing

      To Wilson and the story being recanted is addressed, and is the major crux. Instances of coaches being falsely or incorrectly accused, like that case, make it more difficult for valid cases like at Rutgers. That’s exactly the point, not an indictment on Leach in the slightest.

      Craig James running for Senate and using the spotlight he cast on himself at Leach’s expense is something I’ve addressed at great length previously:

      http://saturdayblitz.com/2011/12/16/bite-off-more-than-he-can-chew-candidate-craig-james/

      http://thegoodpoint.com/2011/07/bruce-feldman-espn-sports-craig-james/

      http://saturdayblitz.com/2011/07/14/bruce-feldman-craig-james-and-sacred-cows/

      • Kyle Kensing

        Of similar note to the Wilson/Barker stories, this Auburn/Mike McNeil situation: http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/4/3/4180300/auburn-football-mike-mcneil-story

        Heard people ask why RU players didn’t come forward, and there’s any number of reasons, but cases like these certainly add to the difficulty.

      • Fred Garvin

        Oh, I see you edited the piece to correct your mistake regarding Leach running for senate. Good. As far as your statement that “We may never know the validity of either players’ charges. Later actions called some of their complaints in to questions:” In the case of Wilson the validity of the claim IS known…there is no validity. As I said, the matter was thoroughly investigated by both the university and the Pac 12. The allegations were false. As were the allegations against Leach at TT. That was admitted to in depositions by both Adam & Craig James. I guess it’s just the media’s way to continually drag Leach’s name up whenever allegations of player abuse come up?

        • Kyle Kensing

          The Craig and Adam James case is relevant in that people asked the question, ‘Why didn’t Rutgers players come forward against Rice?’

          That became the most high profile example of a player coming forward, and the fact it was so ridiculous has set something of a precedent that would make it difficult for other players with legitimate concerns to come forward. There’s an ulterior motive stigma, as Wilson had and expressed in his rescinding statement. That’s why it’s relevant here.

          As to the point about validity,if I may: we don’t know exactly what occurs in those practices. Not like at Rutgers, because of the tapes. Hence the point of internal monitoring, does that make it a good idea, so the athletic departments can know what occurs in practice at all times, and can then deem what is acceptable? WSU deemed Leach’s practices acceptable after an investigation. Would a proactive approach *before* a player makes claims be the right way to go?

TEAMFeed More Saturday Blitz news from the Fansided Network

Hot on the Web From golf.com